I know I do.
Most politicians are toxic and should have warning labels tattooed on their forehead so you know to avoid direct contact.
I could spend every blog entry delving into their constant lies and misdeeds, but it's just too depressing.
So instead of focusing on the dregs of humanity ↴
![]() |
top row: wicked witch of the west and cryin' chuck bottom row: dumb and dumber |
↳ today we're going to embrace happier themes.
...so time to crank up production again at our seasonal treat factory headquarters.
Off to a slow start but never fear...we'll be fully operational before you can say "what the heck have we gotten ourselves into?"
We also interviewed our final candidate for this year's Walk Of Fear™:
A grim looking fellow, I didn't hold out much hope.
"Must have been a very good pumpkin harvest this year," I suggested.
"You're the 11th pumpkin we've had applying for this opening.
"Why should we use you?"
He tried to explain...
...but as you can hear, didn't really say much.
"Thank you for not talking with your mouth full," I told him, "but you might want to see a dental surgeon about that...um, problem.
"Appreciate your interest; we'll let you know."
We also contacted Big Frank who kindly agreed to grace us with his presence again...
Who knew? Big Frank's a patriot.
Still have to check on the rest of the gang, currently hibernating in the garage.
More to come...
It seems golfers of old were whacking the little leather spheres quite a bit farther than us, their modern counterparts.
While there are only 2 current versions of featheries being produced today, there have been various iterations that have come and gone over the last 50 years or so.
All of them have (or had) the same issue: they don't measure up in terms of distance achieved.
So what was a good drive with featheries in the early 1800s?
While there are records of ridiculously long drives exceeding 350 yards (think flat frozen ground and a stiff tailwind), it seems 150 to 200 yards was not unusual.
Our friends Down Under at the Authentic Feathery Golf Ball Co. claim their balls can be hit 160 yards.
Intrigued, I shelled out for 2 of their LION (OS) - OverSized - balls and gave them a try.
Here they are after 9 holes:
The one on the right barely survived 5 holes, then I switched to the one on the left for the last 4 holes.
I did strike them 100 to 110 yards from the tee, but you'd need a cannon to achieve their spurious claim of 160 yards (and a garbage bag to pick up whatever was left of them afterwards).
On the other hand, Lane Co. claims 80 to 100 yards is about average for their featheries...
...which matches precisely my experience with their ball (and it's MUCH more durable than the LION ball).
So what was the secret ingredient present in yesteryear's featheries that's missing from today's versions?
To date, no one seems to know.
Apparently manufacturers back then did not leave detailed instructions behind re: their process, probably for the same reason industries keep secrets today:
The basic idea with featheries is simple enough:
Both the leather and feathers are wet during production; as they dry, the leather shrinks and the feathers expand, making a solid ball.
Did they just stuff more feathers into the leather spheres than they do today, thus producing a higher compression ball?
Or did they treat the ingredients with something that caused them to expand - or the leather to contract - more than normal?
Whatever their "secret sauce" was then, it remains so today.
And while I appreciate a commitment to traditional methods and materials, from a practical standpoint I'm more interested in results.
Golfers of old - as golfers now - did not gather up their equipment and trek to the links to have roundtable discussions re: manufacturing technology.
They swung their hickories and played the game they loved.
For those of us who still perform the black arts of hickory golfery...
...is "historical accuracy" important?
Of course it is.
I swing hand made hickory clubs crafted according to templates from the pre-1900 era.
It's really a question of what's more important: materials and methodology, or results?
Both would be ideal, but if forced to choose, I'll take historically accurate results any day of the week.
In my world, the "must haves" to qualify as a feathery golf ball include a leather cover and some feathers inside.
Beyond that, anything else required from a methods and materials standpoint is fine with me as long as I swing and it lands 140 or so yards away.
Neither of today's feathery golf ball companies are there yet, but at least the LANE ball is durable.
And Hickory Lane keeps working to improve performance, with word of a recent breakthrough re: distance that sounds promising.
For now, my plans for what's left of this rapidly disappearing season...
Next year? Time will tell.
Maybe the good folks at Hickory Lane will indeed have improved their featheries to within spitting distance of their ancient forebears.
I hope so; 'twould be lovely to spend the rest of my days playing feathery golf.
Time for everyone's favorite oddity, 23 Skidoo:
the continuing saga of Chippy: he pokes his head up from his hole in our wall and wonders, "what's that delightful smell?" |
"Ah," thinks he, "lunch!" |
we leave our diminutive hero to his delicious repast. |
![]() |
some colorful mid-october sunrises from Larry's cottage "up north" |
Turns out Mom and Dad were right after all when they kept after us to get up off our butts and get busy doing something useful:
"10 Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep:
"11 So shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth, and thy want as an armed man."
- Proverbs 6:10,11
later, mcm fans...